Boeotian shield vs. hoplite shield pro#
Boeotian shield vs. hoplite shield series#

Taking as a case study the so-called ‘Borysthenes coins’, the largest and most famous bronze series in the history of the Olbian coinage, this paper explores the connotative meaning of coin imagery and its potential as a communication and marketing tool. To understanding a number of other coin types and iconographic motifs in the coinages of Olbia and other Greek centres of the region. An integrated approach that takes into account not only the metrological and chronological character-istics of coins, but also the contextual typological analysis, along with theĭistribution of nds within and beyond the polis territory, provides the key plex, chronological, and typological study of the so-called Olbian ‘archers’ – the 4Ĭentury BC coin issue that marked the successful liberation of the city from the siege laid by the Macedonian troops – once again demon-strates the role of the coin typology as an important means of visual com-munication and a valuable historical source.

Boeotian shield vs. hoplite shield pro#

Meaning of their coin images and the choice of specic iconographic pro Our fragmentary knowledge of the political and economic his-tory of the GreekĪround the Black Sea is often the reason why the The major reason behind Theban victory was Epaminondas’ renewal of the phalanx.

The spartans and romans had a very similar tradition of that style of fighting and it would turn into a bloody mess. I have said in the past that 'If the phalanx broke swords would be drawn by the spartans which werent 100 useless in close quarters unlike the Macedonians. The 'Scythian' attire of the archers on the vases, therefore, has nothing to do with the real Scythians of the North Pontic area. But as I have said a Spartan Hoplite is quite different than a Macedonian phalanx. The real prototype of the 'Scythian' archers were the archers of different ethnical groups first of Median, and later of Persian army. Hoplites woudnt be able to perform underarm attacks in a shieldwall, usually fights of hoplites vs hoplites were mainly both sides pushing their enemies shield to shield, while underarm was imposible to do, the overarm would be posible and really afective to surpass the enemy shield which is actually locked down. Enter the email address you signed up with and well email you a reset link. 530 and 490 BC, and then went out of use, because after the Greco-Persian wars these clothes began to be associated with ethnical identity, though not Scythian, but Persian. I agree with the overarm way for hoplites. Did They Really Return upon Their Shields The of the Spartan Hoplites at Lechaeum, 390 BC. This scheme in vase-painting existed between c. The 'Scythian' clothes corresponded to the character's function, not to his ethnical identity. The clothes were rather an iconographic conventionality symbolising a second rank character accompanying a hero. The author concludes that these figures were neither conceived as real ethnical Scythians, nor associated by vase painters or their customers with this or any other people. The article analyses the depictions of archers in so-called 'Scythian' clothes (a high sharp cap or a rounded hood, a caftan and trousers) in Attic archaic vase-painting.